Mia Slama vs Gabriella Broadfoot Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Oct at 03:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Slama vs G. Broadfoot

 USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Slama 1 - 0 Broadfoot
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mia Slama winning 2 and Gabriella Broadfoot winning 0. The last match between Mia Slama and Gabriella Broadfoot was at the W15 Hilton Head Island, 23-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Mia Slama getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Slama | 1 | 
| Broadfoot | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Hilton Head Island(10-23-25)
M. Slama vs G. Broadfoot H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 51.22% (21-20) | Career Total W/L | 61.40% (35-22) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 0 | Titles | 1 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
M. Slama vs G. Broadfoot Match Preview:
- Mia Slama has an edge in second serve performance, claiming 41.88% of points compared to Gabriella Broadfoot's 39.78%. Could this be a crucial factor?
- Interestingly, both have similar success in returning second serves, with Mia slightly leading at 51.92% versus Gabriella’s 51.32%.
- When analyzing first serve returns, Mia Slama again has the upper hand, winning 35.32% compared to Gabriella’s 30.98%. This might predict who could dominate the service games more effectively.
- When under pressure, Gabriella Broadfoot excels, saving 51.32% of breakpoints compared to Mia's 47.17%. Does Gabriella’s composure under pressure make her more likely to turn matches around?
- Gabriella Broadfoot has shown stronger performance overall in the past year with a match win rate of 60.87%, whereas Mia Slama has 55.56%.
- Mia Slama performs best on clay with a win rate of 57%, while Gabriella performs best on hard courts at the same percentage. Could the playing surface tip the scales?
- Mia has been more successful in Futures circuits (75% win rate), while Gabriella has faced tougher competition in Challengers with a 50% win rate. Which experience might provide the edge?
- Mia Slama has played against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 345.28, indicating she consistently faces stronger competition than Gabriella, who faces an average rank of 474.35. Will this experience against tougher opponents benefit Mia?
- If the match goes into a deciding set, both players have a similar success rate of 50%, indicating a possible tightly contested finish.
Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):
As both players prepare to face off, their recent statistics have revealed fascinating insights into where each might have the upper hand.
Mia Slama showcases superior second serve stats and return ability on her opponent's first serve. Meanwhile, Gabriella Broadfoot demonstrates strong resilience, particularly in breakpoint situations.
Gabriella’s higher overall win percentage and experience on hard courts could prove advantageous. However, Mia’s experience against higher-ranked competition and her prowess on return games give her a significant edge.
Considering these factors, Mia Slama appears more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Mia Slama vs Gabriella Broadfoot Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Slama vs G. Broadfoot H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 13 | Games Won | 6 | 
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 | 
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 | 
| 1:35:24 | Average Match Time | 1:35:24 | 
| 55% (37/67) | 1st Serve % | 52% (32/61) | 
| 70% (26/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (18/32) | 
| 43% (13/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (15/29) | 
| 22% (2/9) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) | 
| 46% (28/61) | Return Points Win % | 42% (28/67) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
M. Slama Recent Matches Played
G. Broadfoot Recent Matches Played

M. Slama vs G. Broadfoot Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.22% (21/20) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.40% (35/22) | 
| 51.14% (45/43) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.46% (76/54) | 
| 51.62% (414/388) | Games Win/Loss | 53.14% (643/567) | 
| 43.75% (7/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 70.27% (26/11) | 
| 56.52% (13/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.37% (9/10) | 
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 | 
| 75 | Aces Total | 77 | 
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 | 
| 97 | Total Double Faults | 143 | 
| 1:26:54 | Average Match Time | 1:7:15 | 
| 367.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 319.96 | 
| 55% (1139/2053) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1388/2395) | 
| 61% (698/1139) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (895/1388) | 
| 45% (414/914) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (471/1007) | 
| 46% (120/259) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (151/323) | 
| 46% (950/2065) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1167/2528) | 
| 31.25% (5/11) | Challenger W/L | 47.62% (10/11) | 
| 64.00% (16/9) | Futures W/L | 69.44% (25/11) | 
| 50% (20/40) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (34/56) | 
| 57% (4/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 
| 43% (3/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (10/17) | 
| 90% (21/19) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (31/28) | 
| 10% (21/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (31/3) | 
| 10% (20/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (26/7) | 












